The justice's ruling giving parents an opt-out for a children's book about gay nuptials is limited but has big implications ...

This court decision is a huge sigh of relief. Foundation celebrates court victory in battle with US agency over water ...

The intricacies of the Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) definition continue to evolve, especially with recent changes initiated under the ...

Supreme Court declines to hear a case that challenged the scope of certain citizen lawsuits under the Clean Water Act. ● Bureau of Reclamation’s internal watchdog flags fraud and waste risk in drought ...

"The court dealt a major setback to the EPA and all of us who need clean water," Waterhouse said. "For example, under the ...

The justices’ regular caseload was overshadowed by requests from the president to allow some of his most controversial policies to go forward.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito quoted a five-decades-old case in a decision Friday that favored parents fighting to opt their children out of instruction involving LGBTQ+ books.

In a 6–3 opinion by Justice Samuel Alito, the conservative supermajority agreed, declaring that parents must be allowed to prevent their children from seeing such material.

Sam Alito Is Giving His Fellow Bigots Everything They Want In Mahmoud v. Taylor, six conservative Christian justices decided that the First Amendment gives conservative Christian parents veto power ...

Alito’s dissent reduces the death penalty to a matter of bureaucratic form in which the sentence rests not on what happened but on how skillfully the prosecution framed the murder.

Justice Samuel Alito said the Supreme Court ignored Congress's intention in its ruling on retroactive relief under the First Step Act.