The Supreme Court on Dec. 5, 2025, agreed to review the long-simmering controversy over birthright citizenship. It will ...

On Nov. 5, a skeptical U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases challenging President Trump’s authority to impose ...

When the Supreme Court agreed to hear the Trump administration's petitions seeking to resurrect Executive Order 14160 -- the ...

Advocates for each side will provide a different explanation for who falls under ‘the jurisdiction’ of the United States.

The originalist argument in favor of birthright citizenship is that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction” was meant to invoke only a small set of exceptions found in traditional British common law.

On November 5, 2025, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Learning Resources Inc. v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections Inc., two consolidated cases challenging President Donald Trump’s ...

The high court granted a stay of the lower court order, with the unsigned majority alleging the lower court panel erred in its ruling.

One year ago today, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. Skrmetti, one of the highest profile cases of the 2024-25 term. On June 18, the court […] The post SCOTUStoday for ...

Jackson said the justices' recent order allowing immigration raids set a high bar for getting into federal court.

Both liberal and conservative Supreme Court justices seemed skeptical of New Jersey's efforts to target a pregnancy resource ...

The high court struggled to pin down the standard for holding third parties liable when users violate the law.