Last year, an improperly attached door panel flew off of an Alaska Airlines airplane in midair. No one was hurt, but the incident sparked a fresh round of scrutiny for Boeing and the FAA.

Because Boeing’s instructions for employees lacked “clarity and conciseness,” workers missed opportunities to fix a mistake ...

We are actively monitoring Boeing’s performance and meet weekly with the company to review its progress ... didn't have strong enough safety practices in place to ensure the door plug was properly ...

The Federal Aviation Administration’s ineffective compliance enforcement also led to the 2024 Alaska Airlines incident, the ...

Two planes nearly collided on the runway in Mexico City on Monday, as an AeroMéxico regional jet coming in for landing flew ...

The report contains an exhaustive list of recommendations for both Boeing and the FAA, including convening an independent panel to review the safety culture of Boeing Commercial Airplanes (BCA ...

The head of the Federal Aviation Administration said on Thursday the fatal crash last month of an Air India Boeing 787 jet ...

The head of the Federal Aviation Administration said Boeing has not yet asked the agency to remove a 38-plane per month cap ...

Air India Crash investigation reveals fuel switch concerns, sparking Boeing 787 safety review and urgent inspections across ...

OSHKOSH, Wisconsin ― The head of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said Boeing has not yet asked the agency to remove a 38-plane-per-month cap on 737 MAX production and will review the ...

FAA Administration Bryan Bedford said that Boeing (BA) has not yet asked the agency to remove a 38-jet per month cap on 737 MAX output and will ...

Since 2005, the FAA has relied on employees at Boeing and other aircraft manufacturers to perform some quality-review on behalf of the regulatory agency. After the Max crashes in 2018 and 2019 ...