Justice Amy Coney Barrett and several other Supreme Court justices questioned arguments related to the president’s tariff ...
SCOTUSblog on MSN
Justices evaluate limits of the compassionate-release statute
In Fernandez v. United States and Rutherford v. United States, argued on Wednesday, the Supreme Court considered what ...
SCOTUSblog on MSN
A justice’s most lasting legacy
Empirical SCOTUS is a recurring series by Adam Feldman that looks at Supreme Court data, primarily in the form of opinions ...
The three Trump-appointed Supreme Court justices shared apparent interest in legal rationales that could deliver the ...
Raise corporate taxes. When Donald Trump was first elected president in 2016, the top corporate tax rate was 35 percent.
5don MSNOpinion
Editorial: Is this the end of the Trump trade war?
The Supreme Court appears poised to rein in the president’s tariffs, an illegal tax on American businesses and consumers.
The government’s effort to defend Trump’s IEEPA tariffs as regulatory rather than revenue-raising faces a skeptical Court and ...
Until now, the U.S. Supreme Court has been modestly deferential to President Donald Trump’s executive overreach. Oral ...
"The more likely scenarios would all have Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch voting to strike down the IEEPA tariffs or to curtail ...
Justices questioned the legality of the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump under the IEEPA during Wednesday’s hearing.
Opinion
8don MSNOpinion
JONATHAN TURLEY: Supreme Court ruling on Trump tariffs comes down to a numbers game
Supreme Court justices expressed skepticism about Trump tariffs authority under IEEPA during oral arguments, with Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch raising key concerns.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback