In Fernandez v. United States and Rutherford v. United States, argued on Wednesday, the Supreme Court considered what ...

Empirical SCOTUS is a recurring series by Adam Feldman that looks at Supreme Court data, primarily in the form of opinions ...

Congress should have stepped in to clarify the tariff authority, but instead, the Supreme Court has to again decide.

The Supreme Court appears poised to rein in the president’s tariffs, an illegal tax on American businesses and consumers.

The government’s effort to defend Trump’s IEEPA tariffs as regulatory rather than revenue-raising faces a skeptical Court and ...

Until now, the U.S. Supreme Court has been modestly deferential to President Donald Trump’s executive overreach. Oral ...

Lower courts condemned the treatment of Damon Landor, a Rastafarian, but found that a federal law protecting religious rights ...

In the congressional redistricting case of Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court could rule in a way that defies all the ...

The arguments centered on statutory text, the major questions doctrine, and the institutional consequences of permitting or ...

Trump warned Tuesday that unwinding tariffs could cost the government trillions of dollars. It was both an indication of the ...

Three of the Supreme Court liberal justices have sided with Damon Landor, a Rastafarian man and his bid against state ...

Until now, the U.S. Supreme Court has been modestly deferential to Donald Trump's executive overreach. Oral arguments in the case challenging the legality of the president's tariffs suggest that this ...