The “Terminator” franchise is a confusing mishmash of time travel, altered pasts and adjusted futures. And in the latest movie, “Terminator: Genisys,” the entire timeline got rebooted and ...

The Terminator franchise's two television shows did what the movie were afraid to do, and the risk paid off, with both shows being well-received.

This timeline leads into Terminator Salvation. 5) Sarah Connor doesn’t die of cancer in 1997. Instead, she’s still alive in 1999, when a T-888 (Cromartie) comes back to kill John, and another ...

While James Cameron’s Terminator timeline is officially going to wipe out all of the sequels we’re about to talk about, he’s doing so for a very good reason.

Terminator Zero establishes some interesting time travel rules, namely the fact that every significant change to the timeline creates a new universe. Aware of that, Malcolm Lee realized how absurd ...

In that timeline, instead of first finding out about Skynet and the future war with the robots in 1984 during “The Terminator,” Sarah encounters the robots when she’s a child.

Although not quite a reboot, Terminator: Genisys appears to tweak the original film’s events and go off on its own timeline. Perhaps Stephen Hawking could have used The Terminator to explain ...

Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines 2003 . Sarah Connor is dead. Never discussed fully, outside a comment about her cancer, the waitress-turned-warrior died from leukaemia in 1997 in this timeline.

Wow the timeline in 'Terminator' is really messed up. Kelly Lawler. USA TODAY. ... After a whole bunch of other Terminator movies and many, many Terminators sent back in time, ...

The basic set-up of Terminator, in theory, creates two paradoxes.When the T-800 (Arnold Schwarzenegger) is sent back in time to terminate Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton) before she can give birth to ...

In that timeline, instead of first finding out about Skynet and the future war with the robots in 1984 during “The Terminator,” Sarah encounters the robots when she’s a child.